Real Estate Predictions 2007
January 1, 2010 | Filed Under real estate
Most popular search
Most recent search
Comments
20 Responses to “Real Estate Predictions 2007”
Leave a Reply
20 Responses to “Real Estate Predictions 2007”
Leave a Reply
U nam zijn commentaar uit context. Luister aan de gehele video; luister in feite aan hem op zijn radioshow elke woensdag; maar het belangrijkst, steun hem. Wij wensen mensen als hem om dit land uit recht te maken.
“Is there more money in circulation as a result? No.” If it’s true then I don’t have problem with Schiff but from that video I’ve got probably wrong impression that he supports FRB.
The guy who lent me 100k from someone else for interest now have no reserves is there anything illegal happening here no reserves if the difference between frb and having low reserves if the guy who lent.
My problem.
There is NOTHING free in this world.
When bank lends you money that bank doesn’t have in reserves BOTH of you become thieves because you are stealing wealth from rest of society. Repeat it 10 times a day every day until you get it.
What you can’t seem to comprehend is that Schiff wasn’t talking about FRB; he was talking about the amount of reserves a bank is required to have; he (as I do) believes they should make their own decisions of how much money to hold in reserves which is a completely different thing.
FRB is a government standard. Banks freely lend out more money than they have because the government enables them to; this goes against the free market.
“Money has value; and just like anything else, we are free to rent it out for profit (interest).” But those money are out of thin air. You are not renting banks money. You are not renting its clients money. You forcefully rent it from someone else. It is theft. Both you and bank are THIEVES!
U begrijpt niet. Schiff en zelf zijn tegen FRB. Wat wij aren' t tegen is banken besluitend hoe zij hun eigen bank kunnen leiden. Als zij groot risico willen nemen, zijn zij vrij dit te doen zolang zij de gevolgen begrijpen.
Het geld heeft waarde; en enkel als iets anders, kunnen wij het voor winst (rente) verhuren. FRB betekent de bank doesn' t moet zich over reserves ongerust maken omdat zij altijd zeer goedkoop van Gevoed (gedrukt geld) kunnen lenen; op dit ogenblik is het geld praktisch vrij!
Es sei denn es Bankkartell ist. Lesen Sie Rothbard. Er erklärt, warum es für große Banken und Bankkartelle so rentabel ist. Wieder Bruchreservebankverkehr = -inflation. Wenn Sie gegen Inflation dann sind, müssen Sie gegen Bruch sein aufheben Bankverkehr.
Weet u dat als u $100k in de bank hebt en u uw geld naar een andere bank wilde overbrengen, uw bank de federale te krijgen reserve contacteren dat $100k omdat zij don' t heeft het in hun reserves. Vandaar dat baseren zij zich zo zwaar op verwaarloosbaar reservebankwezen; omdat gevoed altijd daar een geldschieter van laatste redmiddel moet zijn. Als er gevoed geen waren; de bank zou het geld van een andere bank moeten lenen die HOGE rente zou laden; zo zouden zij met hun reserves zeer zorgvuldig zijn
LOL absolutely not. Fractional reserve system and deposits exist only for stealing people’s money. Why do we want gold standard? Because amount of money = amount of gold. With fractional reserve system amount of money in the system > amount of gold. Prices go higher. As result everyone’s money is stolen. It is same as inflation. It just redistributes money from majority to bankers. That’s how Rothshilds became so powerful. Because they were first who implemented such system on the world-scale
Are you saying that if someone wanted to lend their money to a private bank for an agreed upon interest rate and the bank agreed to pay that interest so they can lend the money out at a higher interest; the government should step in and prevent that free market contract from taking place?
…because if you think that way, YOU are the problem!
Problem is there should’t be deposits at first place. Deposits are scam. Anyone who supports fractional reserve banking support big bankers like Rothshilds.
He doesn’t support fractional reserve banking; he believes that the banks should be subjected to the free market rather than be protected by the government and be free to set their own standards.
The banks should decide what they believe to be sufficient reserves. Remember, if a bank has to keep 100% reserves, they cannot pay interest on deposits If banks aren’t protected by the government, they would be more careful with their lending because they would be subjected to failure.
Kerel I' ernstig m. Hij steunt verwaarloosbaar reservebankwezen. Let op deze video – horloge? v=Cux97u9Ca5M bij 2:03 zegt hij duidelijk dat hij het steunt. SCHIFF IS KWAAD!
Are you braindamaged boy? Peter Schiff hates everything that has to do with paper money. He’s on many shows each week telling the world about it. You cannot have fractional reserve banking with a gold standard.
Peter Schiff apoya actividades bancarias fraccionarias de la reserva. Él es un Rothshilds' shill
Two dumb SOB’s laughing at a logician…..Makes for great television…..Unless of course you’re one of those two SOB’s.
are you ***?
le racisme fait à soooooo de personnes… le yuck sans attrait